Monday, April 30, 2007
The Great Mystery
Friday, April 27, 2007
Prayer; What is it Good for?
- Eugene H. Petersonfrom "Earth to Altar"
Thursday, April 26, 2007
TIS THE spring of souls today;
Springtime in the Cemetary
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Spring
Rachel Carson, The Sense of Wonder
Monday, April 23, 2007
The Fire Next Time
- James Baldwin
from "The Fire Next Time"
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Autism is a Bad Case of the Human Condition
............There are so many ways for us to misunderstand and hurt each other, and even when things are at their best a sense of separateness shadows our joy. We look at others from the outside, making guesses about they're thinking. We reach out, and the very skin that allows us to touch is the barrier that keeps us apart. The most that two people can be is two planets in a common orbit, and it's at the happiest of times that we recognize this limitation. Maybe that's why people cry at weddings.
The problem that autists have with other people is just an extreme form of the alienation that troubles us all. Autists have a bad case of the Human Condition. Parents of autists may feel: if even the best human relationships are sadly limited, what hope is there for my child? ...............
Parents are pained by their inability to reach an autistic child; he's only a few feet away, at the other end of the sofa, but might as well be circling the dark reaches of space. But he is known by God. He is transparent to the light of God, who shines through us all, who understands us and our children, and everyone we know, and everyone we don't. Only in him will we one day love each other the way we want to, the way he already does. St. Paul writes, "Then I shall understand fully, even as I have been fully understood" (1 Corinthians 13:12). We have been fully understood, even the least explicable among us, and one day we will rest in tranquil full communion.
Friday, April 13, 2007
these words of C. S. Lewis have been encouraging
C.S.Lewis Mere Christianity
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Love is our true destiny(and it helps us know our name).
- Thomas MertonLove and Living, edited by Naomi Burton Stone and Br. Patrick Hart Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1985, page 27
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Origen
St. Melito of Sardis: Candidate for Patron Saint of the Emerging Church
You’re St. Melito of Sardis! You have a great love of history and liturgy. You’re attached to the traditions of the ancients, yet you recognize that the old world — great as it was — is passing away. You are loyal to the customs of your family, though you do not hesitate to call family members to account for their sins. Find out which Church Father you are at The Way of the Fathers! |
The Creation
(The Great Spirit) of the Ojibwe
Out of nothing he made rock, water, fire, and wind. Into each he
breathed the breath of life. On each he bestowed with his breath a
different essence and nature. Each substance had its own power
which became its soul-spirit.
From these four substances Kitche Manitou created the physical
world of sun, stars, moon and earth.
Then Kitche Manitou made the plant beings. These were four
kinds: flowers, grasses, trees and vegetables. To each he gave a
spirit of life, growth, healing and beauty. Each he placed where it
would be most beneficial, and lend to earth the greatest beauty
and harmony and order.
After plants, Kitche Manitou created animal beings conferring on
each special powers and natures. There were two-leggeds, four-
leggeds, wingeds and swimmers.
Last of al he made man. Though last in order of creation, least in
the order of dependence, and weakest in bodily powers, man had
the greatest gift, the power to dream.
Kitche Manitou then made The Great Laws of Nature for the well
being and harmony of al things and al creatures. The Great Laws
governed the place and movement of sun, moon, earth and stars;
governed the powers of wind, water, fire and rock; governed the
rhythm and continuity of life, birth, growth and decay. All things
lived and worked by these laws.
Adapted from Basil Johnston: Ojibway Heritage: The ceremonies, rituals, songs,
dances, prayers and legends of the Ojibway. McCleland and Stewart 1976,
reprinted 1998; Toronto.
Protect
Respect
Regenerate
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
........faith in Elijah is easier to understand than faith in Jesus.
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
As Found on Tro&Tank
We are people - flesh and blood - image bearers of the Creator - eikons, if you will. We are not numbers.
We are the eikons who once sat in the uncomfortable pews or plush theatre seating of your preaching venues. We sat passively while you proof-texted your way through 3, 4, 5 or no point sermons - attempting to tell us how you and your reading of The Bible had a plan for our lives. Perhaps God does have a plan for us - it just doesn't seem to jive with yours.
Money was a great concern. And, for a moment, we believed you when you told us God would reward us for our tithes - or curse us if we didn't. The Law is just so much easier to preach than Grace. My goodness, if you told us that the 1st century church held everything in common - you might be accused of being a socialist - and of course, capitalism is a direct gift from God. Please further note: Malachi 3 is speaking to the priests of Israel. They weren't the cheerful givers God speaks of loving.
We grew weary from your Edifice Complex pathologies - building projects more important than the people in your neighbourhood...or in your pews. It wasn't God telling you to "enlarge the place of your tent" - it was your ego. And, by the way, a multi-million dollar, state of the art building is hardly a tent.
We no longer buy your call to be "fastest growing" church in wherever. That is your need. You want a bigger audience. We won't be part of one.
Our ears are still ringing from the volume, but...Jesus is not our boyfriend - and we will no longer sing your silly love songs that suggest He is. Happy clappy tunes bear no witness to the reality of the world we live in, the powers and principalities we confront, or are worthy of the one we proclaim King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
You offered us a myriad of programs to join - volunteer positions to assuage our desire to be connected. We could be greeters, parking lot attendants, coffee baristas, book store helpers, children's ministry workers, media ministry drones - whatever you needed to fulfill your dreams of corporate glory. Perhaps you've noticed, we aren't there anymore.
We are The People formerly known as The Congregation. We have not stopped loving the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Nor do we avoid "the assembling of the saints." We just don't assemble under your supposed leadership. We meet in coffee shops, around dinner tables, in the parks and on the streets. We connect virtually across space and time - engaged in generative conversations - teaching and being taught.
We live amongst our neighbours, in their homes and they in ours. We laugh and cry and really live - without the need to have you teach us how - by reading your ridiculous books or listening to your supercilious CDs or podcasts.
We don't deny Paul's description of APEPT leadership - Ephesians 4:11. We just see it in the light of Jesus' teaching in Mark 10 and Matthew 20 - servant leadership. We truly long for the release of servant leading men and women into our gifts as apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers. We believe in Peter's words that describe us all as priests. Not just some, not just one gender.
We are The People formerly known as The Congregation. We do not hate you. Though some of us bear the wounds you have inflicted. Many of you are our brothers and our sisters, misguided by the systems you inhabit, intoxicated by the power - yet still members of our family. (Though some are truly wolves in sheep's clothing.)
And, as The People formerly known as The Congregation, we invite you to join us on this great adventure. To boldly go where the Spirit leads us. To marvel at what the Father is doing in the communities where He has placed us. To live the love that Jesus shows us.
Addendum: This is a polemic. The first-person plural pronoun, "We", is not used as Pluralis Majestatis (the Royal We) but rather is based on the post-charismatic/post-evangelical conversations that are occurring in the blogosphere. I have no more right to speak in this voice than any other person living in the liminal reality of the church in 21st century.
by Bill Kinnon
of Ahieveable Ends
http://www.kinnon.tv/2007/03/the_people_form.html#more
Monday, April 02, 2007
This I Believe
The Impossibleape
A Cross-Shattered Christ
Known for afflicting the comfortable, Duke University professor Stanley Hauerwas "has been a thorn in the side of what he takes to be Christian complacency for more than 30 years," according to his fellow theologian Jean Bethke Elshtain. Whether condemning abortion or the war in Iraq, his views challenge believers to see Jesus' message as a radical one. ............
Hauerwas critiques the narcissism of today's Christians, saying "sentimentality is the urge to make the gospel conform to our needs, to make Jesus our 'personal' savior." This seems to echo what happened after the movie 'The Passion.' A lot of people were repeating the well-known profession, "Jesus died for me"-but with quite an emphasis on the 'me.' That Protestant evangelicals would leave Gibson's movie and say "gee, I didn't know he had to suffer so much for my sins"-quite frankly, that's to make yourself more important than you are. It also underwrites satisfaction theories of the atonement, which fail to do justice to the fact that this is the second person of the Trinity who is suffering.
When you say, "someone had to suffer to reconcile me with an angry Father," you forget: it's not an angry Father who has given the Son to receive our violence. The problem with saying "I didn't know he had to suffer that much for my sins" is it fails to do justice to the Trinitarian character of the Christian faith. What is happening in the cross is a cosmic struggle.
..............any account that suggests God has to satisfy an abstract theory of justice by sacrificing his Son is clearly wrong. The problem with those kinds of typologies is they separate the person from the work of Christ. They concentrate on the cross, separate from the life. I think it's a deep mistake. It's one of the problems with Mel Gibson's film........
Can evangelicals still make an argument that we should think of Jesus as our personal savior, and think of the gospel in terms of how it affects individual people? I really don't like the word 'personal.' It makes it sound like I have a relationship with Jesus that is unmediated by the church. They have the idea that "I have a personal relationship with Jesus that I go to church to have expressed." But the heart of the gospel is that you don't know Jesus without the witness of the church. It's always mediated.......
Jesus' death and resurrection are not the solution to the problem of death. Many people take it as such. It's a deep mistake, a pietistic reading of the cross. The idea is that Jesus overcame death through the resurrection. What that does is fail to appreciate the fact that the resurrected Christ is the crucified Christ. It's not like, "Oh, that was just a mistake, now it's over." Jesus continues to suffer from our sins..........
The Suffering Servant aka History cont'd
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/161/story_16134.html
Stanley Hauerwas
....... "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?",shatter our attempts to understand God in human terms.
It shows that Christ does experience the darkness of being completely alienated from the Father........
And that means there is a time when we cannot approach God through Christ, because Christ was completely abandoned. That is a chilling, chilling notion: that there is a time when we cannot reach God through Christ. I think that's what that means.
...........It's idolatry to think that to be a Christian means this is all going to work out well for me. That's not what God is in the business of being God for. The idea that Jesus' whole project was to make sure my life would be OK is a far too narcissistic account of the crucifixion.
......we try to explain the "why have you forsaken me?" phrase to "protect God from making a fool out of God." Because we want God not to be the God we find in Christ. We want God to be the great all-powerful daddy, who makes sure our lives will not have to be lives of suffering. It's an idolatrous position.
.........should we expect God to do anything about our suffering? We know God has done something about our suffering-it's called the cross. It gives us the resources to have even our suffering be a service to God and God's kingdom.